Saturday, November 10, 2007

Do not get discouraged, Here's what Hillary is up against:

Alright so I've been hearing concerns from Hillary supporters because of all of these latest smear hit pieces. Let me show you what we're up against, you'll see that no other candidate stands a chance (let alone has the attributes of compassion, loyalty, patriotism, and integrity that only Hillary has).

John Edwards: yesterday's news. Nobody cares about him anymore, his only role now is to smear hillary.

Barack Obama: Absolutely no substance. He talks about a new kind of politics but never gets to any detail about what he stands for.

Chris Dodd: fringe candidate. No chance in hell.

Joe Biden: he has street cred but nothing else.

Dennis Kucinich: people are already starting to suspect he's from mars. No competition here.

Mike Gravel: nuts.

Bill Richardson: who? He's only running this race to expand his name recognition.

Mitt Romney: No way a Mormon could be elected president.

Giuliani: pro-war cross dresser. Not a chance.

John McCain: his party has abandoned him.

Fred Thompson: a dummied down Dr. Phil. Too lazy, no substance.

Ron Paul: fringe candidate.

Tom Tancredo: who?

Mike Huckabee: Former baptist minister. The last thing America wants is a theocracy.



And that's it folks. Could you really imagine any of these candidates seriously beating Hillary? No way Jose.

5 comments:

Tombo said...

A Mormon can't be president? There is only one choice? Claims that other candidates are dumb?

Doesn't sound like you want a democracy, good thing that some of us can't stand the thought of a Hillocracy

And by the way, since you admitted in other posts that planting questions and lying are not really all that bad, I'm not sure you should list integrity as one of the qualities that Hillary has.

badqat said...

Wow...I've got to take issue with almost the entirety of this post.

Let's start with the obvious. You state that a reason that Hillary should be president is due to the "...integrity that only Hillary has." Excuse me? I guess we must have differing definitions of what integrity is.

Secondly, as I've already mentioned before, rather than coming up with sentient and sound arguments to support your positions, you resort to tactics that lack any integrity. Perhaps you are the perfect Hillary supporter.

I'm quite fond of how you simply dispense with everyone else in the race currently. Again, no intellectual arguments, but a straight up, personal attack on each of the candidates.

About Edwards you state that "Nobody cares about him anymore, his only role now is to smear hillary." But we don't see Edwards making audience plants, do we?

About Obama you claim "absolutely no substance. He talks about a new kind of politics but never gets to any detail about what he stands for." Hate to break it to you, but we've been seeing the same behavior out of Hillary as of late.

I'll skip the rest of the Democratic candidates since you dispense with them with much less substance, style or sincerity.

On Romney you claim that there is "no way a Mormon could be elected president." Funny...people used to say the same thing about Catholics. Care to recall one John F. Kennedy?

In terms of Rudy Giuliani you state that he is a "pro-war cross dresser." I'm confused. Didn't Hillary vote to authorize the action in Iraq? Sounds like your own candidate is pro-war as well. I won't respond to your closing remark, because you didn't honestly support it.

After a few more gems, you then bring up Mike Huckabee, about whom you identify as a "former baptist minister." You continue by saying "The last thing America wants is a theocracy." But never do you mention exactly how Huckabee plans to install a theocracy in the United States.

Of note is what appears to be bigotry in your posts. Are you a bigot? You slam Romney for being a Mormon, and then you add to the religious bigotry with your comments on Huckabee.

Americans are guaranteed freedom of, and from religion in the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

And let's not forget that Article VI, section 3 of the United States Constitution guarantees that " ...no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

So it would not only appear that you are a bigot, but also that you are not a patriot, as your bigotry extends to making exclusions of the United States Constitution that you don't personally agree with.

I am glad you can support the candidate of your choice. However, I would love to see intellectual honesty in your efforts to support her. I think it might also be nice if you could do so in a way that doesn't resort to bigotry.

ryanshaunkelly said...

colbert gravel kucinich paul nader carter [conyers?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.

honesty compassion intelligence guts...

Obama Fan said...

Thanks for your comment on my blog. It's nice to see that someone in Hillary's camp wants to make unsubstantiated claims about other candidates.

You say that no other candidate has honor, integrity, patriotism and compassion, but to use an extreme example (for a Democrat), I can give you at least one Republican candidate, John McCain, who has these attributes. I would really love to see you condemn a man as unpatriotic when he sacrificed five years of his life as a prisoner of war for our country. It is incredible that you would imply that someone like John McCain does not have inegrity or honor after being wounded and imprisoned while fighting for his country.

It's nice to see that even though you're not old enough to vote, you're paying attention and keeping track of the American political process and that you have an opinion, no matter how ill-informed or unsubstantiated. I look forward to the day when you are old enough to vote and fully participate in our democratic process.

Bob's Blog said...

Hilarious website!